![]() Other Linux distros likely have it in their archives too. You can install Sound Converter on Ubuntu straight from the Software App. The app was recommended to me by Martin Wimpress (the Ubuntu MATE guy). Sound Converter is not a new app, and it hasn’t been recently updated - but it works, and works well. The utility is able to extract the audio from videos files too.Ĭould you probably do all of the above a teeny bit faster by using the command line? Probably.īut drag and dropping a folder of audio files on to this app, hitting convert, and getting you files promptly spat out in the format you need isn’t exactly a great hassle either. Other features include an advanced filename and folder organisation based on audio file tag. This sounds technical and aloof but it means the app is able to convert large numbers of files quickly, utilising all available processor cores. With a single click the app can chomp through and convert any number of audio and video files to an audio output choice of your choice, including Ogg Vorbis (.ogg), FLAC (.flac), or WAV (.wav) format, and, of course, MP3 (.mp3).Īnother big plus point to Sound Converter versus other apps of this kind is that it has full support multithreaded conversion. it can process any audio (or video) file supported by GStreamer, including the ubiquitous MP3, the more marginal M4A, as well as movie files like MOV and MP4. Sound Converter is an audio converter app for Linux. mp3 - and SoundConverter did what I needed effortlessly. (note: I made the effort, since the dawn of the digital age, to convert any/all lossless formats, e.g., ALAC, APE, WAV, WMA, SHN, etc.) to FLAC (-8).Īs for playback applications on LINUX OS, I'm sure there is a large array of options "out there", so ask around and get the impressions of LINUX users who play digital music from that OS.Though I tend to stream music from the cloud when at my desktop PC, I prefer to download and play local audio files when listening to podcasts and audio books on the move.Įarlier this week I needed convert a stack of old audio books from the .m4a format to a more Android-friendly format like. CUE file data to guide the playback of any digital music in a personal stash of some 10+ GB of lossless FLAC material. The cue-splitter script I wrote provides support for UTF and non-UTF-encoded cuesheet files, properly handling accented characters in filenames and songnames (tested with spanish and french accents), generating non-accented filenames for the mp3 cuts, but preserving the accents in the ID3 tags. ![]() CUE files where Medieval CUE Splitter cannot.Īnyway, once you've split the "whale" files into tracks, you're no longer beholding to a playback tool, e.g., FOOBAR, recognizing "splits" per the organization of a. That said, EAC can manage its way around certain - but not all - defective. ![]() CUE file.īythe way, one can also use EAC to split tracks but it is (far) less user friendly than Medieval CUE Splitter. Yes, it is tedious, but an advantage is that you can split the WHALE how you prefer, rather than what the publisher decided re: the. CUE file has an error (that you cannot manage to "repair" by hand), and thus cannot be "split" w/ a tool, you can pop that BIG FUCKING WHALE FILE into an editor like Audacity and split tracks by ear. DL (it's free) a tool like Medieval CUE Splitter ad it's a snap. CUE file? This has been my SOP for (going on) 20 years. But it's probably a tiny fraction of sales.Īnd, zillion versions is an asset in a lot of ways, but it probably makes marketing harder.ĭid'ja ever consider splitting the big ol' "whale" (FLAC, WAV, etc.) file into tracks via the. ![]() I know Dell was (still is?) selling machines with Linux installed, maybe some other vendors. And if you're making buying decisions for a business, Windows is the safe choice. So Microsoft has a huge advantage because machines ship with its OS. I only miss two apps from my Windows days, and more and more work is on the cloud. Software availability and file formats are no longer a problem. Most non-geeks in my experience don't care about the operating system, don't see it, and don't think about it when they're "operating." I put Mint on my wife's old machine and she just happily went about her everyday online life, not giving a s^%t about the OS. It's more work for a non-geek user who just wants to get online. Installing it and getting it up and running. Windows can be tweaked, but most users don't. It just dawned on me that hardly anyone installs Windows.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |